Kirby Vining

C100 wrote to urge the Zoning Commission not to hold a scheduled vote on final text amendments, citing a grave procedural flaw: the final rule text was based on a formula different from that advertised in the proposed rules issued for comment.  The revised formula was one requested by a building industry trade association in comments filed on the last day for public comment.  The Commission declined to accept C100's filing but nevertheless reissued the rule.