The Committee of 100 on occasion testifies or submits comments on individual zoning cases where the subject doesn’t fit under the other defined zoning categories.
Document Library
- Individual Zoning Cases
Case No. 25-13 - Committee of 100 on the Federal City's Comments in Opposition
Committee of 100 on the Federal City's comments in opposition to the Office of Planning’s proposal to upzone upper Wisconsin Ave (Zoning Commission Case 25-13).
Case No. 25-09 - Committee of 100 on the Federal City's Written Submission
C100 comments in opposition to the Office of Planning’s proposal to upzone Cleveland Park/Woodley Park (Zoning Commission Case 25-09).
C100 Testimony in Opposition to proposed Navy Yard Development – Case No. 23-27
Carol Aten
C100 appeared in opposition to this application because it offers less affordable housing than required and violates the Height.
C100 Testimony DC Council on DC Archives
Caroline Petti
The Committee of 100 enthusiastically supports the establishment of a new Archives at the UDC Van Ness Campus.
C100 Comments Zoning Commission Case No. 23 02 Opposing U Street Upzoning
Shelly Repp
The C100 appears in opposition to this application submitted by the Office of Planning. The upzoning would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Mid-City Area Element and would deal a serious blow to the principle of adapting infill development to the surrounding neighborhood. Simply put, there need to be guardrails placed on any development of this site.
C100 Comments Zoning Commission Case no. 22 36 Opposing Takoma Park Metro Development
Laura Richards
The C100 appears in opposition to this application because of its patent noncompliance with the Comprehensive Plan and with the associated Rock Creek East Area Plan and the Takoma Central District Plan. Approval of this application in its current form will deal a serious blow to the principle of adapting infill development to the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed multi-family building at the Takoma Metro Station simply is too tall for the location.
C100 Statement Zoning Commission Case 14 11B
Laura Richards
The Committee of 100 on the Federal City opposes proposed section A 301.14 to the Zoning Regulations of 2016. The new section provides for a vesting period to July 1, 2017 during which individuals may file building permit applications for rear extensions longer than the 10 feet proposed to be permitted as a matter of right under this rulemaking. An application must be accepted as complete by the D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs by the July 1 deadline.