The Smithsonian Institution proposes a radical make-over of its South Mall Campus, including the Haupt Garden and structures in the Quadrangle behind the Castle Building facing Independence Avenue. The Danish architectural firm Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) developed four alternatives for a master plan of this area. None of the alternatives provides for restoration of the Haupt Garden; three alternatives call for the demolition of three pavilions; and the preferred alternative explicitly proposes demolition of the following architecturally and historically significant structures and landscapes on the site:
- The three entrance pavilions designed by noted architect Jean Paul Carlhian for the National Museum of African Art, the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, and the S. Dillon Ripley Center;
- The Victorian Enid A. Haupt Garden designed by landscape architect Lester Collins; and
- The Renwick Gates, constructed from James Renwick’s original 1849 design, now the entrance to the garden.
The Smithsonian proposes to replace the Haupt Garden and Carlhian pavilions with an inappropriate-to-the-historic-context large, flat multi-functional area with futuristic skylight entrances giving direct access to a new basement level Visitor Services area and the Museum of African Art and Sackler Gallery below ground. The Smithsonian’s rationale for the demolition is to allow repair of the membrane roof beneath the Garden that covers the underground spaces, and to improve visitor access and enjoyment. The Committee of 100, however, does not believe these needs justify or require destruction of these historically significant
The master plan also contemplates major modifications to other historically significant buildings on the South Mall Campus: Freer Gallery of Art, Castle Building, and Hirshhorn Museum. Modifications include a new entrance to the Freer on the West wall, and demolition of the Gordon Bunshaft-designed walls on the Hirshhorn. Also planned are extensive underground facilities with above-ground skylights, and a major seismic retrofitting of the Castle Building itself.
The Smithsonian has hosted six public meetings as consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and under the National Environmental Policy Act, to refine the master plan. The Committee of 100 participated in and offered comments at these meetings as a consulting party. We are waiting for the Smithsonian’s answers to the many substantial questions posed by us and the public at these meetings and in comments online. Additional remarks will be posted as information from the Smithsonian becomes available.
In the News:
“Don’t destroy the Smithsonian’s beloved Haupt Garden.” James M. Goode. The Washington Post, March 20, 2016.
“Mall Plan Scrutinized.” Peggy McGlone. Washington Post. April 9, 2016
“Smithsonian Should Set Standard on Public Signs, Not Fight Oversight.” Philip Kennicott. The Washington Post. December 4, 2015.
- C100 Letter Garden Club Of America Enid A Haupt Garden
- July 18, 2016, Nancy MacWood
We are grateful for The Garden Club of America’s interest in the historic Enid A. Haupt Garden and its preservation. Your featuring the proposed destruction of the garden on The Garden Club’s website home page was welcome news to the several organizations nationally and locally that are also opposing the demolition of the garden.
- AOIDC Smithsonian South Campus Plan Opposition
- April 1, 2016, William N. Brown
Although we are supportive of efforts to rehabilitate the Smithsonian Castle and, perhaps, redesign the entrances to the Sackler Gallery, the National Museum of Asian Art and the Ripley Center, we believe that these initiatives can be accomplished without the extreme changes that would removed the custom-designed and compatible Renwick Gates and destroy the Haupt Gardens.
- C100 Call To Action - Oppose Smithsonian Proposal To Destroy The Haupt Garden
- April 08, 2016, Historic Preservation Subcommittee
CALL TO ACTION: Oppose Smithsonian Proposal to Destroy the Haupt Garden
- ACHP Response To C100 Regarding SI South Mall Campus Master Plan
- February 19, 2016, Reid J. Nelson
At the urging of C100 and other consulting parties, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) determined that it should enter into the process to ensure that the procedural issues raised by consulting parties are properly addressed, and that the Smithsonian meaningfully considers alternatives to adverse effects on two National Historic Landmarks and other properties potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
- C100 Letter NCPC South Mall Campus Master Plan EIS
- February 18, 2016, Nancy MacWood
The C100 has responded to the National Capital Planning Commission's Federal Register Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement on the Smithsonian Institution's proposed South Mall Campus Master Plan.
- C100 DCPL South Mall Master Plan Ensure Historic Accuracy
- February 19, 2016, Nancy MacWood, Rebecca Miller
The Committee of 100 on the Federal City (C100) and the DC Preservation League (DCPL) urge the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to enter consultation on the Smithsonian Institution’s proposed South Mall Campus Master Plan to ensure resolution of the Plan’s potential adverse impacts on National Historic Landmark buildings, buildings listed in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), and potentially eligible historic properties.
- December 5, 2015, Nancy MacWood, Rebecca Miller, Robert Nieweg
C100, DC Preservation Leauge, and the National Trust for Historic Preservation calls on Smithsonian Institution to fully comply with Section 106 requirements.